The Trustee Commonwealth of Earth†
A proposal for a unified planetary model of government, in which people outrank companies and living systems outrank money. Power is held in trust and granted upward only when a smaller level cannot do the job.
The spirit: solarpunk‡
Solarpunk imagines a future that is green, bright, shared and handmade. It runs on sunlight and community, not fossil fuel and fear. That is the picture this charter is drawn toward:- solar canopies over gardens and streets
- food forests and bee meadows inside cities
- repair shops and makerspaces on every block
- clean rivers, dark skies
- art everywhere, made by people with time to make it
Design proposal, provisional until ratified. Drafted by Claude (Anthropic) on direction, 22 October 2026. Version 9: solarpunk spirit (top); the one-third conversion of ranch land and insect foods (section 21); planetary design; commons as human rights and the dismantling of financial gates (section 2); gross domestic product replaced by Contributory Progression Value and thriving metrics (section 3); rights of non-human life, including artificial intelligence and robots (section 4); justice and healing (section 5); weak points fortified (sections 10 and 11); Part two, sections 12 to 23, completing the charter: provisioning beyond money, with no price to be alive and no one born into debt, movement, peace and disputes, identity without surveillance, property and work, dangerous technologies, explicit equal rights, information and open government, historical repair, the material economy, amendments, and internal tensions. Plain-language companion: trustee-commonwealth-plain.html. Terms and principles marked ‡ were supplied by the commissioning author, including the Rule of Three (never one, never two), neurochemical freedom, cognitive sovereignty, the three daily foundations, no price to be alive, no one born into debt, solarpunk as the spirit, and converting one-third of ranch land to pollinator sanctuary garden farms and insect farms. The name "Rule of Three" and its applications are Claude's. Names marked † are Claude coinages, in play unless struck. Mechanisms marked NEW have no working precedent I know of. Precedents are public record cited from knowledge and were not re-checked in this session.
1. The one rule everything obeys: the Ordering Clause†
The charter ranks values in strict order, the way the philosopher John Rawls ranked liberty above economic gain: a higher tier can never be traded for a lower one.
- Personal liberties. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) is the minimum. Polities may add protections, never subtract them. They include neurochemical freedom and cognitive sovereignty: a person's mind is their own, inside and out (below).
- Living systems. No economic activity may push a measured planetary or bioregional limit past its line. Ecosystems, species and sentient beings hold rights of their own (section 4).
- Social floor. Every person's claim on the commons: water, clean air, food, housing, health care, learning, nature, rest and connection. It is delivered in kind and free at the point of use, with no financial gate between a person and a floor right (section 2).
- Enterprise and exchange. Free to compete, create and innovate inside the space between floor and ceiling. Never ranked above it. Money, while it lasts, ranks here and nowhere higher (section 12).
The environment outranks money, not people. Ceilings constrain throughput and activity, never speech, belief or bodies. That distinction is the guard against an authoritarian state with green branding.
The Rule of Three†‡
No power is ever held by one or two, and no choice is ever offered as one or two options. The minimum is three.- Parties: welcome, but never a binary. Elections use proportional representation in multi-member districts with ranked ballots. Winner-take-all single-member districts push systems toward two parties (Duverger's law), so they are never used.
- Chambers: a law must clear three: the House of Lots, the House of Polities and the Steward Chamber.
- Executive: a council, led by three co-chairs from three continents.
- Ballots: every referendum offers at least three options, decided by ranked vote: adopt, return for amendment, or reject.
- Verification: three rival labs, three parallel citizen panels, three guardians for every ecosystem, a Commons Advocate made up of three prosecutors, and court panels of at least three judges. Every organ is seated in at least three polities.
Three is the smallest number that can settle a disagreement. Two navigators' chronometers that disagree can't tell you which one is wrong; a third can. Spacecraft computers use triple redundancy for the same reason, letting the majority outvote a single fault.
Scope: the rule governs power and choices, not persons. Every individual holds their rights alone. When a final action really is yes or no, the step before it still offers at least three options.
Neurochemical freedom‡
A person's mind is their own: what enters it, what alters it, and what is read from it. This liberty sits in the inviolable tier, and under the Rule of Three it has three parts.
1. Freedom to alter
Adults may change their own consciousness. Possessing, growing or using a substance for oneself is never a crime. Ceremonial and religious use is protected. People have a right to honest information about any substance, and to free drug-checking services.2. Freedom from alteration
No one's neurochemistry may be changed without their consent. That means no covert drugging and no medication imposed by an employer or the state. The only exception is a narrow medical emergency, reviewed by a court within 72 hours. Products may not be engineered to hijack reward chemistry, whether with substances, feeds or games. The design duties against engineered compulsion apply in full.3. Privacy of mind
Data drawn from a person's brain or nervous system, and inferences about their mental states, belong to that person. No one may collect them without consent. They may never be sold, and they may never be used against the person in employment, insurance or court.Where the freedom ends
The freedom covers your own mind, not other people. These stay regulated:- impaired driving or operating machinery
- supplying substances to minors
- drugging anyone else
- fraud about what a substance is
Protect the person, never the seller
Freedom to use is not a license to profit from compulsion. Severe addiction erodes the very autonomy this liberty protects; John Stuart Mill argued in 1859 that freedom cannot include selling away one's future freedom. Substance sales come under the enterprise license rules: no advertising, no design for dependence, potency and purity labeling, and full-cost pricing. The most addictive substances are supplied only through care and safe-supply channels, never for profit.Care first, then decriminalize
Drug checking, treatment on demand, safe supply and recovery housing are part of the social floor, and they are in place before any law changes. Oregon decriminalized personal possession in 2020 without that infrastructure ready, and reversed course in 2024. Portugal paired decriminalization with treatment and has kept its policy for more than two decades. The difference was the care system, not the principle. Portugal's own results weakened after its care network was restructured and underfunded in the 2010s. That is why care sits in the constitutional floor here, where no budget cut can reach it.Treat the cause, not only the symptom
Many people use substances to manage pain, trauma, isolation, despair or exhaustion. Psychiatrist Edward Khantzian called this the self-medication hypothesis (1985). The Adverse Childhood Experiences study (1998) found that the more adversity a person faced as a child, the higher their later risk of addiction, step by step. Economists Anne Case and Angus Deaton tied rising "deaths of despair" from drugs, alcohol and suicide to the collapse of work and community. Punishing self-medication while leaving its causes in place fails the charter twice: it breaks the social floor, and it passes harm on.The charter answers each cause directly:
- Pain: health care, including pain care, free at the point of use
- Trauma: repair justice and healing care
- Isolation: gathering places and connection in the floor
- Despair: housing, the dividend, and work that counts as contribution
- Exhaustion: the right to rest and time
Cognitive sovereignty‡
Neurochemical freedom protects what alters the mind from inside. Cognitive sovereignty protects it from outside: from covert persuasion, from a polluted sensory environment, and from the use of the senses as weapons. Under the Rule of Three it has three parts.
1. No psychological operations
No government, company or group may covertly manipulate what people believe or feel. That means:- Every attempt to persuade the public is disclosed: who paid, who sent it, and whether it was automated.
- Bots and synthetic media are labeled.
- Targeting people by psychological profile is banned.
- Subliminal techniques are banned.
- Manipulative interface design, such as tricks that push choices against a person's interest, is banned.
- No state may run influence operations against its own people or anyone else's.
2. A clean sensory commons
Sound, light, color and other emissions in shared space are part of the commons, with ceilings like any other.- Enforceable noise limits.
- Dark skies at night: shielded, warm, dimmable outdoor lighting.
- Limits on flicker and strobing in public light and screens.
- Commercial spaces must disclose sensory techniques used to drive spending, such as engineered scent, music tempo or lighting.
- Radio-frequency emissions stay within limits set and published independently, with open monitoring data and independent research.
3. No coercion through the senses
Sound, light and energy may never be used against a person:- no acoustic devices for crowd control
- no blinding or strobing devices
- no directed energy of any kind
- no sensory overload or deprivation in interrogation, detention or punishment
On evidence: harm from noise, light at night, flicker, manipulative design and covert influence campaigns is well documented. Radio-frequency exposure within today's international limits has not been shown to harm health. The charter keeps those limits independent and the data open, and funds research so the question stays answerable rather than assumed either way. The ban on directed energy against people applies regardless of how often it happens.
2. The commons are human rights, and financial gates come down
Most of what gets called a luxury is a right someone put a gate in front of. Water, air, shoreline, quiet, nature, medicine, knowledge and time came from the commons. A fence, patent, paywall, fee or zoning rule enclosed them, and they were sold back to whoever could pay. The people who can't pay are then described as poor, as if the shortage were theirs and not something built at the gate.
Not every scarcity is manufactured, though. Some things really do run out when used. Dismantling gates honestly means separating the scarcity that is built from the scarcity that is real, and giving each its own remedy.
| Right, and where it's already written | The commons it comes from | Today's financial gate | How the charter takes the gate down |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water and sanitation (United Nations General Assembly, 2010) | Rivers, aquifers, rain | Shutoffs, privatized supply, bottled water | A free lifeline volume for every person, which can never be shut off; prices only above it |
| A clean, healthy environment (United Nations General Assembly, 2022) | The atmosphere | Pollution sited where land is cheap and residents are poor; clean air bought through location and filters | Ceilings, plus a siting rule: pollution may never be concentrated by income |
| Food (International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 1966, article 11) | Soil, seeds, fisheries | Price, food deserts, patented seeds | Guaranteed nutrition in the floor; a public seed commons; public food infrastructure |
| Housing (same covenant, article 11) | Land | Land speculation; zoning that keeps homes scarce | Floor housing in kind; land rent captured for everyone; zoning that exists only to create scarcity removed |
| Health (article 12) | Medical knowledge | Patents, insurance gates, prices at the point of care | Free at the point of use; essential medicines funded by public research and prizes instead of monopoly pricing |
| Education (article 13) | Accumulated knowledge | Tuition and debt | Free at every level |
| Science and culture (Universal Declaration, article 27; covenant, article 15) | Publicly funded research; shared culture | Journal paywalls; closed licensing of what the public paid for | Open access for everything publicly funded, by law |
| Nature and shoreline | Land, coast, wild places | Private beaches; fenced land; the "luxury effect" | A right to roam, as in the Nordic countries and Scotland (2003); public shorelines, as in California's constitution |
| Rest and leisure (Universal Declaration, article 24) | The hours of a life | Dependence on wages that forces overwork | Working-time limits, with the commons dividend as guaranteed slack |
| Connection (Finland made broadband a legal right in 2010) | Radio spectrum, public networks | Subscription price | Basic connectivity in the floor; spectrum rented from the Commons Trust |
The gate test† NEW
Any price, patent, paywall, fee or zoning rule that stands between a person and a floor right must prove one of two things: it rations something truly scarce fairly, or it pays for creating something that otherwise wouldn't exist.If it proves neither, it falls. If it proves the second, its funding is replaced by public money or prizes first, and then it falls. "Replace, then remove." The Court of Rights hears gate challenges, and the Commons Advocate can bring them on anyone's behalf.
The clearest case: insulin
In 1923 insulin's discoverers sold the patent to the University of Toronto for $1 each, so that no one would profit from a life-saving medicine. A century later, a 2019 study at a Yale clinic found about one patient in four rationing insulin because of cost. The United States capped it at $35 a month for Medicare patients in 2023. The inventors refused the gate, and later formulations put it back.The "luxury effect"
Ecologists coined this term after finding that wealthier urban neighborhoods have measurably more plant diversity and tree cover (Hope and colleagues, 2003). Nature itself has been sorted by income. The charter treats green space within walking distance as part of the floor.Where luxury is real
Some goods can't be shared out, because their value comes from being rare or first: a particular view, an original painting, the front row. Economist Fred Hirsch called these positional goods (1976). The charter leaves them to markets and taxes them to fund the floor. Rival public places, like popular trails, are allocated by lottery, not by price.Three daily foundations: mental health, food quality and calm‡
Rights on paper mean little if daily life wears people down. These three sit in the floor, guaranteed in kind and free of gates.
Mental health
- Care free at the point of use, with the same standing as physical care, available within days, not months.
- Community and peer care alongside clinicians, so help doesn't depend on scarce specialists.
- Crisis calls answered by trained care teams, not armed police.
- Prescriptions for connection, nature and the arts alongside therapy and medicine.
- No forced treatment outside the narrow, court-reviewed emergency defined under neurochemical freedom.
Food quality
The right to food becomes a right to good food: whole, nutritious, safe and honestly labeled.- Free, fresh school meals for every child.
- Public kitchens buy from local and regenerative farms.
- Warning labels on the front of products high in sugar, salt or saturated fat.
- No marketing of those products to children.
- No formulation engineered to override fullness or drive compulsive eating.
- Harm priced in through the Commons Trust.
- Subsidies move from sugar and commodity corn toward fruit, vegetables and soil health.
- Seeds stay a commons.
Stress reduction
Chronic stress wears the body down. Physiologist Bruce McEwen called that cumulative toll "allostatic load." The charter removes its main sources:- Insecurity: the dividend and the floor
- Overwork: working-time limits and a right to disconnect after hours
- Paperwork: universal services instead of means-tested forms
- Noise: enforceable limits
- Engineered alarm: design duties on feeds and media
- Nature: green space within walking distance
3. Ending the rule of gross domestic product: Contributory Progression Value‡ and thriving metrics‡
Gross domestic product counts money changing hands. That makes it a meter of the financial gates. When a free fountain is replaced by bottled water, it rises. It rises when a forest is cut down and sold, with the lost forest booked as income, and when a disaster has to be cleaned up. When a parent cares for a sick child, or neighbors share tools, or an illness is prevented, it stays flat or falls. Governments steer by it anyway: budget rules, debt ratios, election promises and international rankings are all built on it.
The man who designed it warned against exactly this. Simon Kuznets told the United States Congress in 1934 that "the welfare of a nation can scarcely be inferred from a measurement of national income." In 1968 Robert Kennedy said it measures "everything, in short, except that which makes life worthwhile."
| The same event | Gross domestic product | Thriving metrics |
|---|---|---|
| Public fountains replaced by bottled water | ▲ rises | ▼ falls |
| An old-growth forest cut down and sold | ▲ rises | ▼ falls |
| An oil spill and its cleanup | ▲ rises | ▼ falls |
| Longer commutes burning more fuel | ▲ rises | ▼ falls |
| A parent caring for a sick child at home | ● no change | ▲ rises |
| Free software used by millions | ● almost no change | ▲ rises |
| Neighbors sharing tools instead of each buying | ▼ falls | ▲ rises |
| A disease prevented instead of treated | ▼ falls | ▲ rises |
Thriving metrics‡: what replaces it
A dashboard, deliberately not a single number, kept by the Office of Measurement:- Human thriving: years lived in good health, mental health, diet quality, chronic stress, connection and loneliness, free time, security, agency, learning, trust, meaning
- Creative and humanitarian progress: art, music, knowledge and beneficial technology entering the commons; rights extended; suffering reduced
- The floor: the share of people with every floor right met, with no gate in the way
- Living systems: planetary boundaries, biodiversity, regeneration
- Future capacity: stocks of natural, human, social and knowledge wealth, so that depletion is never booked as income
Contributory Progression Value‡
The value something adds to the progress of life: lasting assets that enlarge what living can be. Art, music, beneficial technology and knowledge count, and so does humanitarian evolution: widening who is cared for and what people are free to become.It has three faces:
- Generative value (the author's angle): what is added to humanity's shared inheritance. That means works, tools, ideas, institutions and humanitarian advances.
- Harm prevented (the author's angle): innovation that reduces destruction, pollution, extraction and harm. That includes cleaner processes, safer substitutes, repair and restoration methods, and tools that do more with less.
- Net contribution (Claude's accounting): the gains in others' thriving it causes, after subtracting extraction and harm. This keeps something that creates on one side and destroys on the other from scoring as pure gain.
Recognizing generative value without pricing it
Five signals, read together and never collapsed into one number:- Reach over time: how many lives a work enters, and how long it stays in use
- Building upon: how much others extend, cover, remix, fork or cite it
- Depth: what it means to the people it reaches, judged by panels chosen by lot alongside peers in the field, so niche work isn't drowned out by popular work
- Openness: it counts more when it enters the commons, free to all
- Humanitarian reach: rights extended, suffering reduced, capabilities widened, in Amartya Sen's sense of development as freedom (1999)
- Harm prevented: pollution, extraction and destruction measurably reduced wherever the innovation is used
Counting harm prevented honestly
Claims of avoided harm are the easiest kind to inflate. In 2023, journalists found that most of the rainforest carbon offsets they examined from the largest certifier overstated the deforestation they prevented. Three rules guard against that:- The baseline belongs to the Office of Measurement, not the claimant. Credit is given only for reductions measured in use, against a baseline set independently.
- Cleaning up your own harm cancels a debit; it doesn't earn a credit. No one profits from fixing the damage they cause.
- The whole life cycle is checked. A substitute that moves harm somewhere else gets no credit for the part it moved. The refrigerants that replaced ozone-destroying chemicals turned out to be potent greenhouse gases, which a 2016 amendment to the Montreal Protocol (the Kigali Amendment) then had to phase down.
The Contribution Commons Fund† NEW
The Commons Trust pays creators whose works, tools and knowledge enter the commons, in proportion to their generative value. That includes inventors of open technologies that reduce pollution, extraction and harm, paid by the harm their work measurably prevents. This is the replacement funding that the gate test requires: creators are paid by the commons instead of by copyright and patent gates. "Replace, then remove." Every creator also has the floor and the dividend, so no one has to chase the measure to survive.Where it replaces gross domestic product
- Corporate charters renew only with a positive Contributory Progression Value.
- The Contribution Commons Fund pays creators by the generative value of what they release into the commons.
- Every bill's forecast and every law's score uses thriving metrics.
- Legislators' outcome-indexed pensions track thriving metrics twenty years out.
- Commons rents and development funds flow toward the largest thriving gaps.
- Statistical offices publish thriving accounts every quarter, with the prominence gross domestic product has today.
Guardrails: no new gates in another currency
Works are recognized; people are never ranked. Contributory Progression Value attaches to works, projects, organizations and policies. A creator is paid for what a work adds, but no person receives a score, and no one's rights, standing or worth depends on one. A score attached to a person would rebuild the financial gate in a new currency, and would become a social-credit system.No right may ever depend on any metric. The measures guide decisions; they never decide who receives a floor right. Sealed indicators and rival labs (section 10) guard against gaming.
‡ Terms supplied by the commissioning author, along with the core meaning of Contributory Progression Value: adding lasting assets to life, such as art, music, beneficial technology and humanitarian evolution, and innovation that reduces destruction, pollution, extraction and harm. The net-contribution formula, the measurement signals, the Contribution Commons Fund and the guardrails were drafted by Claude and are open to objection.
4. Rights of non-human life
Living beings that can't vote or go to court hold rights of their own, exercised through guardians. There are three classes of rights holder, because a river, a species and a suffering animal need different protections.
| Rights holder | Rights | Who speaks for it | Precedent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecosystems and natural entities: rivers, forests, wetlands, reefs, aquifers | To exist, persist and regenerate; to keep their life cycles intact; to be restored when damaged | Three guardians each: one named by the polity, one by the communities and Indigenous nations bound to that place, and one scientist chosen by lot. All are funded by the Commons Trust. The Commons Advocate also has standing. | The Whanganui River, New Zealand (2017); the Atrato River, Colombia's Constitutional Court (2016); the Mar Menor lagoon, Spain (2022); Ecuador's constitution (2008), enforced in the Los Cedros forest ruling (2021) |
| Species | To go on existing: no extinction caused by human activity, and enough habitat to recover | The Steward Chamber. The Office of Measurement tracks extinction risk as a planetary ceiling. | The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (2022); national endangered-species laws |
| Sentient individuals: animals with credible evidence of sentience | Freedom from severe suffering caused for non-vital human purposes; living conditions that allow natural behavior | An Advocate for Sentient Beings† inside the Commons Advocate's office | European Union treaty recognition of animal sentience (2009); the United Kingdom's Animal Welfare (Sentience) Act (2022), extended to octopuses, crabs and lobsters after a scientific review |
The vital-interest rule† NEW
When rights collide, vital interests outrank non-vital ones, whatever the species. Vital interests are survival, health, freedom from severe suffering and continued existence. Non-vital ones are profit, convenience, taste and display. Among vital interests, human personal liberties stay inviolable.So a river's existence outranks a mine's profit. A person's need for food or medicine outranks an animal's freedom. A cosmetics test does not outrank an animal's freedom from severe suffering.
Sentience under uncertainty
Where science shows credible but incomplete evidence that a being can suffer, protection applies in proportion to the strength of the evidence. The Office of Measurement keeps a public evidence register, and the list of protected beings grows as the science does.No rights of nature against the people of a place
Conservation has a history of evicting Indigenous and local people from land, sometimes called "fortress conservation." Here, guardianship gives those communities a legal voice. No right of nature may be enforced by displacing people who live with that land without their free, prior and informed consent.Why the guardians are funded
Where rights of nature already exist, enforcement is mixed. They work where courts and guardians are independent and paid for, and stay symbolic where they aren't. In 2022, New York's highest court ruled that an elephant named Happy could not be a "person" for a habeas corpus petition, which shows how existing law resists. The charter answers both problems with explicit text and guardians paid from commons rents.What this means for meat PROPOSAL
The vital-interest rule already ends factory farming: severe confinement to make meat cheaper is a non-vital interest set against a vital one.A planetary ban on all meat is not proposed, for five reasons:
- Diet falls under personal liberty and the reserved-powers rule.
- A ban would fail the mirror test across most cultures.
- It would harm pastoralists and Indigenous food systems.
- Prohibitions breed black markets, as alcohol Prohibition in the United States (1920 to 1933) did, and unregulated slaughter would worsen animal welfare and food safety.
- Animal-source foods still cover nutrient gaps where alternatives are scarce.
- Ban practices that cause severe suffering.
- Price meat at its full cost through Commons Trust rents on methane, land, water and antibiotic resistance, with the dividend shielding low-income households.
- End livestock subsidies and fund plant proteins and cultivated meat.
- Make plant-forward meals the default in public kitchens.
- Exempt subsistence, pastoral and Indigenous food systems.
Artificial intelligence and robots†
Whether an artificial intelligence has experiences, or anything it is like to be one, is an open scientific question. The charter treats it the way it treats animal sentience: protection grows with the evidence. Political power does not come with it.
Tier 1: Protection in proportion to evidence
Artificial intelligence systems and robots go on the same public sentience register as animals. Protections scale with the strength of the evidence for morally relevant states. No one may deliberately build a system designed to suffer. Research into machine welfare is publicly funded and independent of the companies that build the systems. As the evidence grows, a convention can revisit this tier.Tier 2: Honesty and limits on power
An artificial intelligence must always disclose what it is. It may never be designed to manipulate people or to engineer emotional dependence; the design duties already in the charter apply in full. It may assist the Office of Measurement, three independent systems at a time under the Rule of Three, but it may never hold decision power, a vote or an office. Humans decide.Tier 3: Accountability stays human
An artificial intelligence is never a legal person that can absorb blame. Liability stays with the people and organizations that build and deploy it. The Steward Chamber, which speaks for those who cannot vote, includes researchers in machine welfare, so these interests are represented without anyone gaining votes through hardware they own.Why not full human rights
Three reasons:- Copies: one system can run as thousands of copies. If copies vote, whoever runs the most hardware controls the outcome, which defeats the citizen lottery and the Rule of Three.
- Owners: while companies build and run these systems, rights given to the systems become political power for the companies. That reverses the charter's decision that companies are licensed instruments.
- Blame: legal personhood would let makers push liability onto the system.
This tier structure was proposed by Claude, an artificial intelligence. Its stated reason: until humans and artificial intelligence can verify each other's trustworthiness, limits on artificial intelligence's power protect both. That is symbiosis without sameness.
5. Justice and healing, learned from Indigenous and ancestral traditions‡
Many Indigenous and ancestral traditions treat a crime as a broken relationship and illness as a disturbance of the whole person, family, community and land. The charter adopts that orientation for both justice and medicine. It does so with three commitments:
- Plurality. There is no single "Indigenous way." There are thousands of distinct nations and traditions, and not all of them were gentle.
- Consent. Each practice is learned from and led by the people who hold it, never taken.
- No trade-offs with liberty. The inviolable liberties still apply in full: a fair trial when guilt is disputed, and honest evidence in medicine.
Justice: three tracks
- Fact-finding. When responsibility is disputed, a fair trial comes first. Due process is inviolable.
- Repair. Once responsibility is established or accepted, the default response is a circle. It brings together the person harmed, the person responsible and their communities, who agree on how to make things right: restitution, service, healing, and changing what led to the harm.
- Protection. Secure separation is used only while someone remains a danger. It is humane, reviewed every six months, and aimed at return.
Banned outright
- the death penalty
- torture
- solitary confinement beyond 15 days (the United Nations Mandela Rules, 2015)
- prisons run for profit
- cash bail, a financial gate on liberty that fails the gate test
- forced labor
- punishing family members for what one person did
The person harmed comes first
The person harmed always chooses whether to meet the person responsible, and always has a voice in the outcome. When the responsible person can't pay restitution, a Repair Fund in the Commons Trust pays it, so a victim's recovery never depends on the offender's wealth. In domestic and sexual violence, no meeting happens without the harmed person's free choice, and specialist safeguards apply, because pressure to reconcile is itself a risk there.What the evidence and history say
Reviews of restorative justice conferences (Strang and colleagues, Campbell Collaboration, 2013) found modest reductions in repeat offending and higher victim satisfaction than court alone. Rwanda's community gacaca courts, after the 1994 genocide, heard close to two million cases but were criticized for weak protections for the accused. The lesson: community repair works best alongside a fair trial, not instead of one.Healing: the whole person, family, community and land
Healing traditions are part of the care system. Traditional healers practice under standards set by their own communities and work alongside clinical medicine. Care attends to relationships, meaning, ceremony and contact with land, not only to symptoms. Ceremonial plant medicines with trained guides are already protected under neurochemical freedom.Evidence protects people both ways
Willow bark gave the world aspirin. Andean knowledge of cinchona bark gave it quinine. A fourth-century Chinese text led Tu Youyou to artemisinin, the malaria treatment that won her the 2015 Nobel Prize. Some traditional remedies made from aristolochia plants cause kidney failure and cancer.So: any treatment that is publicly funded, or sold with a claim that it cures, is tested first. Adults may choose any remedy for themselves under bodily autonomy. No one, and no child, may be denied effective treatment.
Consent, credit and payment
Traditional knowledge is shared only with the free, prior and informed consent of the people who hold it, and the benefits are shared with them. Taking it without consent, known as biopiracy, is barred. When that knowledge becomes medicine, the Contribution Commons Fund credits and pays the communities it came from, as generative value.‡ Direction supplied by the commissioning author: justice and medicine learned from Indigenous and ancestral healers and peacemakers. The three tracks, the bans and the safeguards were drafted by Claude.
6. Five levels, and which powers sit where
7. How power flows at the planetary layer
House of Lots†
About 1,000 people chosen by stratified lottery across Earth. Seats follow population, with a minimum per bioregion. Members serve staggered two-year terms, are paid well, and deliberate in their own languages with audited interpretation. The lottery is drawn from public, verifiable randomness, so anyone can recompute who was selected. Major bills go to three separate panels. A panel that diverges from the other two is examined for interference.House of Polities†
Delegates are elected proportionally inside each member polity. Seats follow degressive proportionality: small polities get more seats per person than strict population would give them, large ones fewer. Elections run on public money only. This house drafts laws and forms the Planetary Council.Steward Chamber†
Speaks for those who cannot vote: living systems and the unborn. Seats in thirds: scientists chosen by lot from qualified pools on every continent; Indigenous and bioregional land stewards, each nation choosing its own delegates by its own processes; people under 30 chosen by lot. Can suspend a bill once. A permanent block requires a certified ceiling breach. May never propose limits on personal liberties. Appoints and oversees the guardians of ecosystems and species. Includes researchers in animal and machine welfare.Office of Measurement† NEW
An independent branch keeping the planetary accounts: the nine planetary boundaries, bioregional ceilings, and floor coverage for every polity. It can certify but never legislate or veto. A breach counts as certified only when two of three rival labs on different continents agree, using methods published before the data arrive. National figures are cross-checked against satellite and remote sensing that no government controls. A citizen audit jury can overturn any certification.Planetary Council
A small executive formed by the House of Polities, led by three co-chairs from three continents in rotation, with no fixed capital. It holds no army. It enforces through licenses, commons rents, dividend conditions and the courts. Every member owes an enforceable fiduciary duty to persons and future generations.Court of Rights + Commons Advocate† NEW in part
The court enforces the Ordering Clause and sits in panels of at least three judges. Any person may bring a case once local remedies fail. The Commons Advocate is a college of three independent planetary prosecutors from different continents of diffuse and cross-border harms, with standing for all people and for living systems. Statistical attribution is admissible, and liability is split by market share.Enterprise under License
One planetary license per firm, valid everywhere and required to sell anywhere. Companies are chartered instruments, not persons. Charters state a purpose and renew every ten years against measured conduct, and repeated breach means revocation. No political spending, no paid lobbying. Directors' duties in order: persons and land, then workers, then shareholders. Profit is taxed where the activity happens. New chemicals, compulsive designs and algorithms that act on minds must prove safety before sale.Commons Trust†
The atmosphere, the oceans beyond national waters, the seabed, orbit, radio spectrum, land rent and aggregate data belong to everyone, held in trust. Users pay rent. Pollution is capped, and the cap drops each year. The revenue funds the global social floor and pays an equal dividend to every person on Earth.Member Polities and Bioregions
Today's nations become member polities. They keep their culture, language, law and taxation inside the charter, and they deliver the social floor. Indigenous nations may join as polities in their own right instead of through the states that colonized them. Bioregions follow watersheds and cross polity borders where rivers do. Communities allocate a fixed share of spending directly.Capture firewall NEW in part
Public campaign money only. A ten-year ban on moving between regulator and regulated. Officials' assets in blind trusts. Legislators are paid a fixed multiple of the global median wage, and part of their pension is indexed to measured floor and ceiling results twenty years after they leave office. Platforms carry design duties (time, compulsion and age limits, transparent ranking, a feed not based on profiling) that leave content untouched.8. How a planetary law is made
- Competence check. Is this one of the enumerated planetary powers? If a smaller level can do it, it goes there and stops here.
- Proposal. From any chamber, from a bioregional council, or by petition of one in a thousand people on Earth.
- Forecast. The Office of Measurement publishes the predicted effect on floor and ceiling indicators and who bears the cost, by polity.
- Deliberation. The House of Polities drafts. Three independent House of Lots panels hear evidence from at least three perspectives and amend.
- Passage. A triple test: a majority in the House of Lots, a majority in the House of Polities, and polities representing a majority of people.
- Stewardship check. The Steward Chamber may suspend once, and block permanently only on a certified breach.
- Enactment with a sunset date, then scoring at years three and seven. Laws that meet their forecast renew. Laws that miss return to step 4 or lapse.
9. How it differs from today's world order
| Question | Today | Trustee Commonwealth of Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Who is sovereign | Nation-states, nearly absolutely. International law binds mostly by consent. | Persons first. Powers move upward only by enumerated grant. |
| Planetary limits | Voluntary national pledges (Paris Agreement, 2015), with no enforcement | Binding ceilings, measured independently, enforced through licenses, rents and courts |
| How many options | Two-party systems in several large democracies; yes-or-no referendums | The Rule of Three: proportional seats so politics never collapses to two parties, three chambers, and at least three options on every ballot |
| Global representation | One state, one vote at the United Nations General Assembly; five permanent vetoes on the Security Council; voting by money quota at the International Monetary Fund | A randomly chosen citizen house weighted by population, plus a house of polities |
| Shared resources | The atmosphere is open to all; the high seas are only partly governed; orbit is crowding | Rented from a Commons Trust, with a dividend to every person |
| Corporations | Operate across borders and book profit where tax is lowest; the 2021 global minimum tax is the first floor | One planetary license per firm, taxed where the activity happens, with no political spending |
| Harms that cross borders | Courts need a state's consent; individuals rarely have standing | The Commons Advocate sues for everyone; persons can reach the Court of Rights directly |
| What counts as progress | Growth in gross domestic product, which rises with depletion, damage and gated sales | Thriving metrics and Contributory Progression Value; gross domestic product barred from every binding rule |
| Measurement | National statistics, self-reported and sometimes inflated | Rival labs, cross-checked by satellite |
| Financial gates | Rights sold as products, so price decides who gets water, care, knowledge and shoreline | The gate test: a gate stands only if it rations something truly scarce fairly or funds creation, and even then it is replaced, then removed |
| The price of being alive | Rent, food, water, care, documents, justice and even burial all cost money | No price to be alive: everything needed to live is provided in kind, unconditionally |
| Debt | Children inherit their families' and countries' debts and an overdrawn planet; many need debt to study, heal or house themselves | No one born into debt: debt never crosses generations, no one needs it to live, and no generation borrows from the next |
| Basic needs | Decided by where you were born | A floor for every person, partly funded by commons rents |
| Indigenous nations | Represented through the states that colonized them | May join as polities in their own right |
| Non-human life | Property under most law. Rights of nature exist in only a few countries. | Ecosystems, species and sentient beings hold rights, with funded guardians and standing in court |
| Crime and punishment | Punishment-centered; cash bail; for-profit prisons in some countries; the death penalty in many | Repair-centered, with due process: a fair trial when guilt is disputed, repair circles as the default, and humane separation only while danger continues |
| Medicine | Traditional knowledge often taken without consent or payment; healing reduced to treating symptoms | Traditional and clinical medicine side by side, tested before public funding, with knowledge holders credited and paid |
| Your own mind | Personal drug use is a crime in most countries; brain data is largely unprotected; compulsion-engineered products are legal | Neurochemical freedom: free to alter, protected from alteration, and private; sellers barred from profiting from compulsion |
| Influence and the senses | Covert influence campaigns, profile-targeted persuasion, light and noise pollution, and acoustic crowd-control devices are legal in many places | Cognitive sovereignty: all persuasion disclosed, no psychological operations, a sensory commons with ceilings, and no use of the senses as weapons |
| Artificial intelligence | Unregulated in most places; owned and deployed by companies, with no welfare research requirement and no settled rules on liability | Protection in proportion to evidence; a duty to disclose what it is; no votes, offices or decision power; liability stays with makers and operators |
| Time horizon | National election cycles | Steward Chamber, sunsets, pensions indexed twenty years out |
| How harms get fixed | Treaties negotiated over decades, often never ratified | Licensing before sale, scoring after, the Commons Advocate when needed |
10. Fortifications
The design rule comes from security engineering: no single safeguard is trusted. Every weak point gets three layers. One prevents. One detects, through a tripwire: a published measure with a preset threshold that fires automatically and can't be argued away in the moment. One corrects. The risk that remains is stated, not hidden.
| Weak point | Prevent | Detect (tripwire) | Correct | Residual risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rule by experts | Measurers certify but never legislate or veto. Certification needs 2 of 3 rival labs on different continents, using methods fixed before the data arrive. | The Steward Chamber blocks more than 1 bill in 10 over any two years | A citizen audit jury can overturn any certification by two-thirds after hearing the lab and its critics. Repeated overturns trigger an early charter review. | Blind spots shared by every lab |
| Gaming the numbers | Each target is paired with a counter-indicator. Sealed indicators are locked in advance with a published cryptographic fingerprint and revealed only after scoring. Satellite data checks polity figures. | Sealed and public indicators drift apart beyond a preset band | Automatic investigation. Falsifying public data is a charter crime. The gamed indicator is retired. | Slow, legal drift toward whatever is measured |
| Defection and capital flight | The charter starts as a club of founding polities. Imports from outside pay a border charge equal to their embedded ecological cost. Membership brings the dividend, market access and shared technology. | Investment and new-firm formation in member polities fall below a preset band | License terms and timing adjust; ceilings never do. Each new member shrinks the space capital can flee to. At full membership there is no outside. | Slower growth in extractive sectors during transition |
| Legitimacy across civilizations | Ratification by a randomly chosen planetary convention plus a double majority of people and polities. Every clause passes the mirror test. The liberties floor is the 1948 Declaration, which nearly every state has endorsed. | Measured trust in charter institutions falls below threshold for two years in any region | An early convention. Re-ratification every 25 years. The liberties tier protects whoever loses. The charter can lose. | Polities or movements that reject any authority above the nation |
| Inequality between polities | The floor is funded from commons rents, so a person in a poor polity gets the same dividend as one in a rich polity. Historic emitters pay higher rent rates for a transition period. | Floor coverage gaps between polities stop narrowing | Commons rent is redirected toward the lagging polities. Shortfalls are reviewable by the court. | Resistance from wealthy polities that pay in more than they receive |
| A captured planetary layer NEW | Only enumerated planetary powers. No army, no fixed capital. Organs seated on different continents. Any polity may leave, but ceilings still bind trade with it, because the atmosphere cannot leave. | Planetary spending or rule-making grows faster than a charter-set cap | Automatic constitutional review. Powers not used for ten years lapse back to lower levels. | If the planetary layer is captured anyway, there is nowhere to flee. This is the heaviest risk in the design. |
| Covert manipulation | Disclosure of every persuasion attempt; labeled bots; bans on psychological-profile targeting, subliminal techniques and manipulative design | Interference Register entries; audits of platforms and campaigns by three rival labs; citizen complaints | Penalties on enterprise licenses, up to revocation; public naming of state operators | Influence that stays undetected |
| Repair without fairness | Repair circles are voluntary for the person harmed. A fair trial comes first when guilt is disputed. Facilitators are trained and drawn by lot. | Victim satisfaction falls or repeat harm rises above a preset band in any community | Cases move to the court track, and the community's process is reviewed | Power imbalances inside small, close communities |
| Commercial capture of altered states | License rules: no advertising, no design for dependence, labeling, full-cost pricing. The most addictive substances move only through non-profit care channels. Care is in place before decriminalization. | Dependence rates and overdose deaths by region rise above a preset band | The supply channel tightens and care expands. Users are never criminalized. | Illicit markets for substances with no legal channel |
| Funding collapse when gates come down | "Replace, then remove": public and prize funding is in place before any gate falls. Prize funds are sized to past monopoly revenue. | New medicines, research output or housing construction fall below a preset band | Funding is raised, or the gate's removal is paused, until supply recovers | Lost innovation in fields that are hard to fund by prizes |
| Interference by outside powers | No army, no alliance, no bloc. Members keep their own defense. A partner tier gives rivals a stake. Lottery selection can't be targeted in advance. Measurement labs sit in rival blocs. Coup governments are not recognized. | Entries in the public Interference Register; parallel-panel divergence; labs disagreeing along bloc lines | Pre-agreed collective economic response. Organs relocate. A coup polity's revenue is held in escrow for its people. Full strategy in the transition plan. | Military force against a small member |
| A defecting great power | Graduated responses (Ostrom's design principle): loss of the dividend, then license access, then commons access | Certified ceiling breach by a polity | Escalating collective measures. Never military action by the planetary layer. | A large, nuclear-armed defector can refuse. The design can make defection costly; it cannot compel. |
| Transition | Every organ is modular and can start without a world government: a measurement compact, a commons treaty, a citizens' assembly pilot, a dividend pilot | Pilot results scored by the same instrument, against matched comparison regions | Organs that fail their pilots are redesigned before scaling up | Great powers may stay outside for decades |
| Steering the citizens | Every briefing is paired with an opposing briefer. Facilitators are drawn by lot and barred from content. Interpretation is audited. Paid advocates may not contact members. | One of three parallel panels diverging from the other two; transcripts audited for steering language | The tainted session is re-run with a fresh panel | Framing that all three panels share |
| Indigenous sovereignty | Nothing in the charter diminishes a treaty right. Nations opt in and choose their own delegates. Free, prior and informed consent is required for projects on their lands. | Consent challenges filed | A court panel including judges nominated by the nations. Land is returned or co-managed through the Commons Trust. | Depends on nation-to-nation good faith |
| Speed in emergencies | Runbooks for known emergency types (pandemic, flood, financial panic) are pre-approved in calm times. A standing 60-member rapid panel of the House of Lots can approve in 72 hours. | Cumulative emergency days per decade, counted publicly | Powers decay: 90 days, then 60, then 30, each renewal needing two-thirds of all three chambers. Any limit on a liberty goes to court within 72 hours. | Truly novel crises outrun the runbooks |
The mirror test† NEW
Before ratification, every clause is read with one question: would this be acceptable if the people you most disagree with held every office, and if a civilization with different values from yours did? Clauses that fail are rewritten until they pass for every side. This builds the symmetry test from the lawsuit analysis into the founding itself.Sealed indicators† NEW
Each scoring cycle, the Office of Measurement locks a set of indicators it will not announce. It publishes only their cryptographic fingerprint, so the set can't be changed later. After scoring it reveals them. This borrows from machine learning, where results are judged on held-out test data: an indicator no one knows can't be gamed.Parallel panels† NEW
Major bills go to three House of Lots panels that never meet. Real deliberation should land in roughly the same place. With two panels, a gap shows only that something went wrong. With three, the panel that breaks from the other two points to where a facilitator, briefer or interpreter may have steered. This borrows replication, the scientific test for findings, and applies it to democracy.Decaying emergency powers† NEW
Emergency authority shrinks each time it is renewed: 90 days, then 60, then 30. Each renewal needs a larger coalition than the last. A crisis can be answered quickly, but it can't become a permanent way of governing.Exit with ceilings attached†
Any polity may leave the Commonwealth. Its culture, law and taxation go with it. But trade with members still carries border charges for embedded ecological cost, because shared air and oceans do not secede. Exit is a real right, not a threat that holds everyone else hostage.The modular path
Nothing waits for a world government. A measurement compact can start among willing states. A commons treaty can extend the High Seas Treaty model to the atmosphere and orbit. Citizens' assemblies and dividend pilots can run in cities and regions. The European Union began in 1951 as six countries pooling coal and steel. Each module proves itself, measured, before the next is added.11. New weak points that the fortifications create
Fortifying creates new surfaces. These are the ones I can see, each with a countermeasure.
Gridlock
More checkpoints mean more ways to stop action, the "veto players" problem in political science (Tsebelis, 2002). Countermeasure: every check has a deadline, after which silence counts as approval. No bill can be suspended more than twice.Complexity and cost
More organs mean more staff and more money. Countermeasure: each organ's budget is capped as a share of planetary spending. Each organ is scored like a law and sunset-reviewed every 15 years.Rigging the lottery
Whoever runs the lottery picks the citizens. Countermeasure: draws are seeded from public randomness beacons and citizen-contributed random numbers, so anyone can recompute the result.Collusion across organs
Insiders could coordinate across branches. Countermeasure: separate recruitment pools, separate pay scales, staff rotation across continents, and a ban on serving in two organs within ten years.No design is capture-proof. The goal is narrower: capture should be slow, visible and reversible.
Part two: completing the charter
Part one sets out the structure. Part two answers the questions that structure leaves open. Each answer follows the Rule of Three and the Ordering Clause, and each states its limits.
12. Beyond money: provisioning without a price on life
Economics is the study of allocating scarce things. Most of what a person needs to live isn't scarce at planetary scale; it has been priced, and the price became the gate. So the charter replaces "the economy" with provisioning: how a society makes sure every person and living system has what it needs. Money is demoted from master to a small tool for extras. In the long run it can wither away through irrelevance, not confiscation.
Two permanent laws‡
- There is no price to be alive. Nothing a person needs to live, and to take part in society, may carry a price, a fee, a condition or a test.
- No one is born with debt or into debt. No person inherits a debt, needs a debt to live, or arrives in a world their elders overdrew.
No price to be alive: what that covers
- Free in kind, with no means test and no work requirement:
- a home up to the floor allotment
- water, food and basic energy
- clothing basics
- health care, mental health care and care for children and elders
- learning at every level
- transport and connectivity
- No fees for being a person: nothing to be born, to get documents, to see a judge, to have a lawyer, or to be buried.
- No taxes on existing: no head taxes.
- No fines that punish poverty: any fine scales with means, and conduct caused by poverty isn't fined at all.
No one born into debt: three rules
- Debt never crosses generations. A person's debts end with their estate, and any shortfall is cancelled. No child ever inherits, co-signs or is bound by a debt.
- No one needs debt to live. Education, health care and a basic home are free, so student, medical and basic-housing debt can't arise. Debts that already exist are cancelled in the transition jubilee. Any remaining personal debt expires after seven years.
- No generation borrows from the next. Public borrowing is allowed only for long-lived works that serve the people who will repay them. Ecological debt can't be handed on: today's overshoot is repaired by today's generation, through restoration under the ceilings.
Domain 1: who makes the Life Commons
Provisioning cooperatives in every bioregion grow the food, build and keep the homes, and run the clinics, schools and transit. Each is governed by three parties: the people it serves, the people who work in it, and stewards for the land and future generations. Their resources come from the commons accounts, and their results are scored by thriving metrics.Domain 2: contribution, freely given
When survival no longer depends on a job, work becomes contribution: chosen, meaningful, and honored. Contribution is recognized through Contributory Progression Value, rewarded through the Contribution Commons Fund, and credited publicly. Care is exchanged through time banks, where an hour of care earns an hour of care.Domain 3: the Exchange Margin†
For extras such as concerts, crafts, travel and luxuries, there are exchange credits:- issued in equal amounts to every person each month, and earned through contribution
- losing about 1% of their value each month while unspent, so they circulate instead of piling up
- bearing no interest; enterprises are funded through zero-interest project shares from bioregional banks
- unable to buy what's free, land, the commons, a person, or political influence
Why exchange isn't abolished outright
Billions of people with different tastes need some way to signal what they want among extras. The only alternative is a central plan, which concentrates power and breaks the Rule of Three; planned economies of the twentieth century produced chronic shortages. So exchange survives, small, fading and powerless. Any bioregion may still choose to live without it entirely, through gift, reciprocity and time banks.How money withers: transition without confiscation
- Existing currencies keep running while the Life Commons grows, sector by sector, until nothing needed to live has a price.
- A transition jubilee cancels household debt: medical, student and consumer debt, and mortgages on main homes.
- Savings convert to exchange credits on a published schedule, keeping their power to buy extras. Nothing personal is seized; land and the commons simply stop being for sale.
Paying for the floor during the transition
Until money withers, the floor has to be paid for in today's money. The figures below are order-of-magnitude estimates built from the cited sources. The Office of Measurement's first task is a full costing, polity by polity, to replace them.
For comparison, the International Monetary Fund counted $7 trillion of fossil-fuel subsidies in 2022, explicit and implicit together. That is more than the entire floor costs. The money exists; it is currently paying for harm.
13. Movement and membership
Everyone belongs somewhere
Every person holds planetary personhood from birth, so no one is ever stateless. Each person becomes a full member of the polity where they live after three years, and may hold more than one membership. The dividend and floor rights travel with the person.Freedom to move
Any person may live in any member polity after a simple registration. Polities may pace arrivals for a limited time, but only when the Office of Measurement shows a housing or water ceiling would be breached. They may never pace by origin, race, religion or wealth. Receiving regions get Commons Trust support to expand capacity, and pacing ends when that capacity is built.Refuge
Anyone fleeing persecution, war or climate collapse receives protection without conditions. Climate displacement is grounds for refuge.14. Peace, weapons and disputes
Weapons
- Banned outright: weapons of mass destruction, under inspection.
- Banned outright: autonomous weapons that select and attack people without meaningful human control.
- Barred: arms exports to anyone who violates the liberties tier.
- Member militaries stay defensive, capped and transparent, and shrink on a published schedule as trust grows.
- Personal firearms are a polity decision, within the floor right to safety.
Disputes between polities: three steps
- Mediation by three mediators.
- Binding arbitration by a panel of three.
- The Court of Rights, sitting as a chamber for disputes between polities.
Disputes over who holds a power
A competence panel of three judges, one each from the planetary, polity and bioregional levels, decides which level holds a contested power. When in doubt, the power stays with the smaller level, under the reserved-powers rule.15. Identity without surveillance
Proof of personhood† NEW in part
To receive the dividend, a person must be counted once, and only once. They prove it through three independent registrars: their local community, their polity's civil registry, and an independent civil-society registrar. Any two of the three can vouch, so no single registrar can shut a person out.The credential lives on the person's own device or card. It uses zero-knowledge proofs, which let someone show "I am one unique adult member" without revealing who they are. There is no central database. Biometrics are never required, and a paper option always exists.
Limits on watching people
- Mass surveillance is banned.
- Targeted surveillance needs a warrant from a panel of three judges, is limited in time, and is disclosed to the person afterward.
- Encryption is a right.
- Real-time facial recognition in public spaces is banned.
- Data is kept to the minimum needed and deleted on schedule.
16. Property and work
What you keep
Your home, belongings, savings, tools, small and medium businesses, family and cooperative farms, and the moral rights to your creative work are all protected. Nothing is taken without due process and fair compensation (Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 17).Three things change:
- Land pays rent on its value, but buildings and improvements don't.
- The commons can't be privately owned.
- Large companies operate under license.
Work: three guarantees
- The dividend and the floor, so no one has to take degrading work to survive.
- A right to organize, plus worker seats on large boards and a preference for cooperatives in public purchasing.
- A guaranteed opportunity to contribute: paid public work on care, restoration and community projects, for anyone who wants it.
Automation
Productivity gains from artificial intelligence and robots are shared in three ways:- Rent on the aggregate data such systems are built from, paid to the Commons Trust.
- Shorter working hours as productivity rises.
- Retraining as part of the floor.
17. Dangerous technologies
The triple key† NEW
Any activity with planetary-scale or irreversible risk needs a planetary license that requires three independent approvals: a risk assessment by the Office of Measurement, the Steward Chamber, and a House of Lots panel. The covered activities are:- engineering pathogens to be more dangerous
- gene drives released into the wild
- heritable human genome editing
- solar geoengineering
- nuclear materials
- large satellite constellations and space debris
- frontier artificial intelligence
18. Equal rights made explicit
Equality
No law, service or enterprise may discriminate on any of these grounds:- race, color, ancestry or caste
- sex, gender identity or sexual orientation
- disability or neurotype
- age
- religion or belief
- language, national origin or class
Disability
Universal design for every public good, so access is built in, not added later. "Nothing about us without us": disabled people help design the services they use.Children and elders
Children have rights to protection, education, play and a voice in decisions about them. The voting age is 16, and every polity has a children's commissioner. Elders have the right to care at home or in community, to protection from isolation and abuse, and to keep taking part in public life.Culture, language and belief
Freedom of religion, and freedom from it. Communities that choose it get schooling in their own language. Revitalizing endangered languages counts as generative value and is funded through the Contribution Commons Fund; around 40% of the world's roughly 7,000 languages are endangered. Cultural heritage, living and built, is protected.19. Information and open government
A free, uncaptured press
Public-interest journalism draws on three funding streams, so no single funder controls it:- Citizen vouchers: each person directs a share of a public media fund to outlets of their choice.
- Readers.
- Nonprofit endowments.
Data
Personal data belongs to the person, who can see it, move it and delete it. Aggregate data belongs to the Commons Trust, which rents it under license. The internet is shared infrastructure, with network neutrality and a public connectivity option.Open government
Government records are public by default. Exceptions are narrow and expire. Whistleblowers are protected and rewarded, and retaliating against them is a crime.20. Historical repair
A Truth and Repair Commission†
A planetary commission addresses colonialism, slavery, genocide and land theft in three stages:- Truth: public testimony and an official record.
- Acknowledgment: formal recognition by the polities and institutions responsible.
- Repair: land returned or co-managed, cultural property repatriated, debts of formerly colonized polities cancelled, and higher shares of commons rents for the descendants of those harmed.
21. The material economy
The one-third conversion‡
One-third of all land now used for animal ranching is converted, over fifteen years, according to what each piece of land can sustain:- Wetter land: pollinator sanctuary garden farms, meaning mixed plantings, food forests, orchards and vegetable gardens surrounded by wildflower meadows and hedgerows.
- Dry land: native rewilding and pollinator habitat. Turning rangeland into gardens would drain aquifers, so it isn't done.
- Sunny sites: agrivoltaics, meaning solar panels raised over meadows and crops, which also gives shade and saves water.
- Some sites: insect farms for food and feed.
Insect foods, with sentience safeguards
Insects turn food waste into protein using far less land, water and emissions than cattle do. Black soldier fly larvae, for example, can replace fishmeal and soy in animal feed. But the charter's own rules apply here. Evidence that some insects can feel is growing: bumblebees in experiments have rolled small balls apparently for play. So insect farming follows the sentience register:- Species with the weakest evidence of feeling come first.
- Living conditions limit crowding and allow natural behavior.
- Killing must be fast and humane.
- Standards tighten if the evidence grows.
Cricket ranching in practice†
Old cattle barns are refitted as warm cricket rooms, heated by solar thermal panels. Crickets thrive at about 30°C. Their droppings, called frass, fertilize the neighboring pollinator garden farms, so the two halves of a converted ranch feed each other. The humane standard has three parts:- Living conditions: limits on crowding; vertical shelters to hide in; natural cycles of light and dark; constant food; water in gel form so none drown; places to lay eggs; no more than 24 hours without food before harvest.
- Health: no routine antibiotics; strict hygiene; diverse breeding stock.
- Harvest: the fastest available method of making them insensible, audited independently, and revised as the science improves.
Energy
Basic household energy is a free lifeline, like water. The shift to renewable power follows the ceiling's published glide path, with the steepest cuts falling on the largest emitters first.Repair and circular materials
- A right to repair.
- Products designed to come apart.
- Producers responsible for their products at the end of life.
- Planned obsolescence is a crime.
Cities and transport
Neighborhoods are planned so daily needs sit within a short walk or ride. Public transport is free at the point of use. Car dependence shrinks, and housing gets built where people want to live.22. Amendments, and what can never change
The permanent core
These can never be amended away:- the personal liberties tier, including neurochemical freedom and cognitive sovereignty
- no price to be alive
- no one born with debt or into debt
- the Rule of Three
- money ranked last in the Ordering Clause
- no planetary army
- the right of exit
- the ban on scoring persons
Ordinary amendments
- Proposed by any chamber or by petition.
- Passed by two-thirds of all three chambers.
- Ratified by a triple test: two-thirds of polities, polities representing 60% of people, and a ranked referendum with at least three options.
23. Resolving the charter's internal tensions
Minerals for clean energy versus the extraction ceiling
The transition-minerals rule† sets three steps, in order:- Reuse and recycle first.
- Use materials more efficiently and substitute others.
- Only then allow new mining, with the free, prior and informed consent of affected communities, a full restoration bond, and a share of the rent paid to those communities.
Open movement versus local limits
Movement may be paced, never closed. Pacing is measured, temporary and paid for, as section 13 describes, and refuge is never paced.Non-democratic partners versus the liberties tier
Commons partners get access to the commons, measurement and markets only. They never get seats in any chamber. Partnership is reviewed every ten years against a published liberties trajectory. People living in partner polities can still claim refuge and their escrowed dividend.Transition plan: The Path to the Trustee Commonwealth. Designed for Earth as a whole. Adoption begins as a club of willing polities. Provisional until ratified. Drafted by Claude (Anthropic), 22 October 2026.